Caring for the Commons: Using Psychological Ownership to Enhance Stewardship Behavior for Public Goods
Peck, Joann, Colleen Kirk, Andrea W. Luangrath, and Suzanne Shu* (2021), "Caring for the Commons: Using Pyschological Ownership to Enhance Consumer Stewardship of Public Goods," Journal of Marketing, 85 (2), 33-49. *All authors contributed equally
How can consumers be encouraged to take better care of public goods? Across four studies, including two experiments in the field and three documenting actual behaviors, the authors demonstrate that increasing consumers' individual psychological ownership facilitates stewardship of public goods. This effect occurs because feelings of ownership increase consumers' perceived responsibility, which then leads to active behavior to care for the good. Evidence from a variety of contexts, including a public lake with kayakers, a state park with skiers, and a public walking path, suggests that increasing psychological ownership enhances both effortful stewardship, such as picking up trash from a lake, and financial stewardship, such as donating money. This work further demonstrates that the relationship between psychological ownership and resulting stewardship behavior is attenuated when there are cues, such as an attendance sign, which diffuse responsibility among many people. This work offers implications for consumers, practitioners, and policy makers with simple interventions that can encourage consumers to be better stewards of public goods.
Should I Touch the Customer? Rethinking Interpersonal Touch Effects from the Perspective of the Touch Initiator
Luangrath, Andrea W., Joann Peck, and Anders Gustafsson (2020). "Should I touch the customer? Rethinking interpersonal touch effects from the perspective of the touch initiator." Journal of Consumer Research, 47(4), 588-607.
Previous research has highlighted the effects of receiving interpersonal touch on persuasion. In contrast, we examine initiating touch. Individuals instructed to touch engage in egocentric projection in which they project their own affective reaction onto their expectations for how the recipient will feel (i.e., empathic forecast), how they appear to the recipient (i.e., metaperception), and the evaluation of the interaction itself (i.e., interaction awkwardness). Touch initiators expect that recipients will feel worse with touch, express concern for how they, themselves, will be perceived, and think that interactions are more awkward. Interestingly, touch recipients do not evaluate these interactions more negatively and leave higher tips after having been touched; touch initiators do not expect this to be the case. As a result, instructed touch initiators (vs. volitional touch initiators) are less (more) likely to engage in subsequent interactions with customers, potentially undermining future service provided to customers. Across five studies, four of which involve actual dyadic interactions, we test the consequences of initiating touch with an inquiry into the effects of interpersonal touch on the initiator. We discuss theoretical and managerial implications.
Hedgcock, William M., Andrea W. Luangrath, and Raelyn Webster (2020). "Counterfactual Thinking and Facial Expressions Among Olympic Medalists: A Conceptual Replication of Medvec, Madey, and Gilovich's (1995) Findings." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Counterfactual thinking, or contemplation of "what could have been," influences facial expressions of Olympic medalists. Medvec, Madey, and Gilovich (1995) revealed that bronze medalists appeared happier than silver medalists after competition in Olympic events. Two prominent explanations for this phenomenon exist: the formation of (a) category-based counterfactuals and (b) expectation-based counterfactuals. First, Medvec et al. (1995) demonstrated that silver medalists formed an upward comparison to the gold medalist with thoughts of "I almost won Gold" while bronze medalists formed a downward comparison to a fourth place finisher with thoughts of "at least I won a medal." A second explanation suggests that medalists form expectation-based counterfactuals in which silver medalists are more disappointed since their prior expectations for performance were higher than bronze medalists (McGraw, Mellers, & Tetlock, 2005). To test these 2 explanations, we compiled a large dataset of medal stand photographs from the Olympic Multimedia Library and Getty Images for the 2000 -2016 Olympic games as well as Sports Illustrated's predictions. Using automated facial expression encoding, we conducted a conceptual replication of prior work and found evidence supporting both category-based and expectation based counterfactual accounts of Olympic medalists' expressions.
Peck, Joann and Andrea W. Luangrath (2018) "Looking ahead: Future research in psychological ownership." Psychological ownership and consumer behavior (pp. 239-258). Springer, Cham
While interest in psychological ownership in consumer behavior has been growing, there are
many research opportunities remaining. This chapter provides a brief summary of the book
chapters and also delineates broad areas for future research. Included are seven sections
beginning with the measurement of psychological ownership in consumer research and potential
new directions. Next are questions and opportunities related to the characteristics of the owner,
and the characteristics of the target, or what is owned. Following this, types of ownership are
discussed as well as time dimensions related to psychological ownership. Then, the downstream
consequences of psychological ownership are detailed including current work and potential
extensions. Finally, the dark side of psychological ownership is acknowledged and situations
where feelings of ownership can be counter-productive are delineated. The intention of this
chapter is to spark new ideas for further work in psychological ownership and consumer
Luangrath, Andrea W., Joann Peck, and Victor A. Barger (2017). "Textual Paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications." Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 98-107.
Both face-to-face communication and communication in online environments convey information beyond the actual verbal message. In a traditional face-to-face conversation, paralanguage, or the ancillary meaning- and emotion-laden aspects of speech that are not actual verbal prose, gives contextual information that allows interactors to more appropriately understand the message being conveyed. In this paper, we conceptualize textual paralanguage (TPL), which we define as written manifestations of nonverbal audible, tactile, and visual elements that supplement or replace written language and that can be expressed through words, symbols, images, punctuation, demarcations, or any combination of these elements. We develop a typology of textual paralanguage using data from Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. We present a conceptual framework of antecedents and consequences of brands' use of textual paralanguage. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Consumer Psychology.
Individual Differences in Interpersonal Touch: On the Development, Validation,
and Use of the "Comfort with Interpersonal Touch" (CIT) Scale
Webb, Andrea and Joann Peck (2015). "Individual differences in interpersonal touch: On the development, validation, and use of the 'comfort with interpersonal touch' (CIT) scale." Journal of consumer psychology, 25(1), 60-77.
This research details the development of the "comfort with interpersonal touch" (CIT) scale designed to measure individual differences in
interpersonal touch tendencies and preferences. The CIT construct is defined as the degree to which an individual is comfortable with intentional
interpersonal touch from or to another person. The scale incorporates the distinction between initiating touch, which is the act of touching someone
else, and receiving touch, which is the act of being touched by someone else. Investigation of this construct includes scale development, measure
purification, and validation. We situate CIT-initiating and CIT-receiving within an approach-avoidance framework and demonstrate that comfort
with initiating touch is more related to approach tendencies such as assertiveness while comfort with receiving touch is more related to avoidant
tendencies such as avoiding crowded spaces. While previous research generally finds positive effects of interpersonal touch, we find that these
effects, at least in part, depend on an individual's comfort with interpersonal touch. We discuss theoretical and managerial implications as well as
future research opportunities using the CIT scale.
Peck, Joann, Victor A. Barger, and Andrea Webb (2013). "In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership." Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189-196.
Previous research has shown that individuals value objects more highly if they own them, a finding commonly known as the endowment effect. In fact, simply touching an object can create a perception of ownership that produces the endowment effect. In this paper, we extend this line of research in several ways. First, we show that haptic imagery, or imagining touching an object, can have the same effect on perceived ownership as physical touch. We then demonstrate that haptic imagery can lead to perceptions of physical control, which in turn increase feelings of ownership. Moreover, the more vivid the haptic imagery, the greater the perception of control and the feeling of ownership. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.